754-member European Parliament (EP) is a key institution of the European Union
(EU), a unique political and economic partnership composed of 27 member
states. The EP is the only EU institution that is directly elected.
Although the EP does not formally initiate EU legislation, it plays a
significant role in the EU’s legislative and budgeting processes, and works
closely with the two other main EU bodies, the European Commission and the
Council of the European Union (also known as the Council of Ministers).
Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) serve five-year terms. The most
recent EP elections were held in June 2009. The EP currently has seven
political groups, which caucus according to political ideology rather than
nationality, plus a number of “non-attached” or independent members. The
EP has 20 standing committees that are key actors in the adoption of EU legislation
and a total of 41 delegations that maintain international
parliament-to-parliament relations. The EP is led by a President, who
oversees its work and represents the EP externally.
Once limited to being a consultative assembly, the EP has accumulated more
power over time. Experts assert that the EU’s latest effort at
institutional reform—the Lisbon Treaty, which entered into force on
December 1, 2009—increases the relative power of the EP within the EU considerably.
The EP now shares legislative power with the Council of Ministers in most
policy areas, giving the EP the right to accept, amend, or reject the vast
majority of EU laws (with some exceptions in areas such as tax matters or
foreign policy). The Lisbon Treaty also gives the EP the power to decide
on the allocation of the EU budget jointly with the Council, the right to
approve or reject international agreements, and greater decision-making
authority on trade-related issues.
Many analysts note that the EP has not been shy about exerting its new powers
under the Lisbon Treaty, and in some areas, with implications for U.S.
interests. In February 2010, the EP rejected the U.S.-EU SWIFT agreement
allowing U.S. authorities access to European financial data to help
counter terrorism; in July 2010, the EP approved a revised U.S.-EU SWIFT
accord, but only after several EP demands related to strengthening data
privacy protections were agreed to by the United States and the other EU
institutions. EP data privacy concerns also necessitated a new round of
U.S.-EU negotiations on another anti-terrorism measure that permits the sharing
of airline Passenger Name Record (PNR) data; an updated U.S.-EU PNR accord
was ultimately approved by the EP in April 2012. Meanwhile, the EU and its
member states are currently unable to join a new Anti-Counterfeiting Trade
Agreement (ACTA)—negotiated by the United States, the EU, and several
other countries to strengthen the protection of intellectual property rights— because
the EP has rejected it due to civil liberty and free speech concerns.
Although supporters point to the EP’s growing institutional clout, others
assert that the EP still faces several challenges of public perception.
Skeptics contend that the EP lacks the legitimacy of national parliaments
and that its powers remain somewhat limited. Criticism has also been directed
at the costs incurred by the EP, especially given what some consider to be
duplicate EP facilities in several European cities and consequent travel
expenses incurred by MEPs.
Ties between the EP and the U.S. Congress are long-standing, and institutional
cooperation currently exists through the Transatlantic Legislators’
Dialogue (TLD). In light of the EP’s new powers following the entrance
into force of the Lisbon Treaty, the EP and its activities may be of increasing
interest to the 113th Congress. Also see CRS Report
RS21372, The European Union: Questions and Answers, by Kristin
Date of Report: January 14, 2013
Number of Pages: 17 Order Number: RS21998 Price: $29.95
For email and phone orders, provide a Visa, MasterCard, American Express, or Discover card
number, expiration date, and name on the card. Indicate whether you want e-mail
or postal delivery. Phone orders are preferred and receive priority processing.